51(y)(7)
用你喜欢的方式阅读你喜欢的小说
巴黎圣母院英文版 - BOOK FOURTH CHAPTER V.MORE ABOUT CLAUDE FROLLO.
繁体
恢复默认
返回目录【键盘操作】左右光标键:上下章节;回车键:目录;双击鼠标:停止/启动自动滚动;滚动时上下光标键调节滚动速度。
  In 1482, Quasimodo was about twenty years of age; Claude Frollo, about thirty-six.One had grown up, the other had grown old.Claude Frollo was no longer the simple scholar of the college of Torch, the tender protector of a little child, the young and dreamy philosopher who knew many things and was ignorant of many.He was a priest, austere, grave, morose; one charged with souls; monsieur the archdeacon of Josas, the bishop's second acolyte, having charge of the two deaneries of Montlhéry, and Chateaufort, and one hundred and seventy-four country curacies.He was an imposing and sombre personage, before whom the choir boys in alb and in jacket trembled, as well as the machicots*, and the brothers of Saint-Augustine and the matutinal clerks of Notre-Dame, when he passed slowly beneath the lofty arches of the choir, majestic, thoughtful, with arms folded and his head so bent upon his breast that all one saw of his face was his large, bald brow.*An official of Notre-Dame, lower than a beneficed clergyman, higher than simple paid chanters.Dom Claude Frollo had, however, abandoned neither science nor the education of his young brother, those two occupations of his life.But as time went on, some bitterness had been mingled with these things which were so sweet.In the long run, says paul Diacre, the best lard turns rancid.Little Jehan Frollo, surnamed (~du Moulin~) "of the Mill" because of the place where he had been reared, had not grown up in the direction which Claude would have liked to impose upon him. The big brother counted upon a pious, docile, learned, and honorable pupil.But the little brother, like those young trees which deceive the gardener's hopes and turn obstinately to the quarter whence they receive sun and air, the little brother did not grow and did not multiply, but only put forth fine bushy and luxuriant branches on the side of laziness, ignorance, and debauchery.He was a regular devil, and a very disorderly one, who made Dom Claude scowl; but very droll and very subtle, which made the big brother smile.Claude had confided him to that same college of Torchi where he had passed his early years in study and meditation; and it was a grief to him that this sanctuary, formerly edified by the name of Frollo, should to-day be scandalized by it. He sometimes preached Jehan very long and severe sermons, which the latter intrepidly endured.After all, the young scapegrace had a good heart, as can be seen in all comedies. But the sermon over, he none the less tranquilly resumed his course of seditions and enormities.Now it was a ~bejaune~ or yellow beak (as they called the new arrivals at the university), whom he had been mauling by way of welcome; a precious tradition which has been carefully preserved to our own day. Again, he had set in movement a band of scholars, who had flung themselves upon a wine-shop in classic fashion, quasi ~classico excitati~, had then beaten the tavern-keeper "with offensive cudgels," and joyously pillaged the tavern, even to smashing in the hogsheads of wine in the cellar.And then it was a fine report in Latin, which the sub-monitor of Torchi carried piteously to Dom Claude with this dolorous marginal comment,--~Rixa; prima causa vinum optimum potatum~.Finally, it was said, a thing quite horrible in a boy of sixteen, that his debauchery often extended as far as the Rue de Glatigny.Claude, saddened and discouraged in his human affections, by all this, had flung himself eagerly into the arms of learning, that sister which, at least does not laugh in your face, and which always pays you, though in money that is sometimes a little hollow, for the attention which you have paid to her. Hence, he became more and more learned, and, at the same time, as a natural consequence, more and more rigid as a priest, more and more sad as a man.There are for each of us several parallelisms between our intelligence, our habits, and our character, which develop without a break, and break only in the great disturbances of life.As Claude Frollo had passed through nearly the entire circle of human learning--positive, exterior, and permissible--since his youth, he was obliged, unless he came to a halt, ~ubi defuit orbis~, to proceed further and seek other aliments for the insatiable activity of his intelligence.The antique symbol of the serpent biting its tail is, above all, applicable to science.It would appear that Claude Frollo had experienced this.Many grave persons affirm that, after having exhausted the ~fas~ of human learning, he had dared to penetrate into the ~nefas~.He had, they said, tasted in succession all the apples of the tree of knowledge, and, whether from hunger or disgust, had ended by tasting the forbidden fruit.He had taken his place by turns, as the reader has seen, in the conferences of the theologians in Sorbonne,--in the assemblies of the doctors of art, after the manner of Saint-Hilaire,--in the disputes of the decretalists, after the manner of Saint-Martin,--in the congregations of physicians at the holy water font of Notre- Dame, ~ad cupam Nostroe-Dominoe~.All the dishes permitted and approved, which those four great kitchens called the four faculties could elaborate and serve to the understanding, he had devoured, and had been satiated with them before his hunger was appeased.Then he had penetrated further, lower, beneath all that finished, material, limited knowledge; he had, perhaps, risked his soul, and had seated himself in the cavern at that mysterious table of the alchemists, of the astrologers, of the hermetics, of which Averroès, Gillaume de paris, and Nicolas Flamel hold the end in the Middle Ages; and which extends in the East, by the light of the seven- branched candlestick, to Solomon, pythagoras, and Zoroaster.That is, at least, what was supposed, whether rightly or not. It is certain that the archdeacon often visited the cemetery of the Saints-Innocents, where, it is true, his father and mother had been buried, with other victims of the plague of 1466; but that he appeared far less devout before the cross of their grave than before the strange figures with which the tomb of Nicolas Flamel and Claude pernelle, erected just beside it, was loaded.It is certain that he had frequently been seen to pass along the Rue des Lombards, and furtively enter a little house which formed the corner of the Rue des Ecrivans and the Rue Marivault.It was the house which Nicolas Flamel had built, where he had died about 1417, and which, constantly deserted since that time, had already begun to fall in ruins,--so greatly had the hermetics and the alchemists of all countries wasted away the walls, merely by carving their names upon them.Some neighbors even affirm that they had once seen, through an air-hole, Archdeacon Claude excavating, turning over, digging up the earth in the two cellars, whose supports had been daubed with numberless couplets and hieroglyphics by Nicolas Flamel himself.It was supposed that Flamel had buried the philosopher's stone in the cellar; and the alchemists, for the space of two centuries, from Magistri to Father pacifique, never ceased to worry the soil until the house, so cruelly ransacked and turned over, ended by falling into dust beneath their feet.Again, it is certain that the archdeacon had been seized with a singular passion for the symbolical door of Notre- Dame, that page of a conjuring book written in stone, by Bishop Guillaume de paris, who has, no doubt, been damned for having affixed so infernal a frontispiece to the sacred poem chanted by the rest of the edifice.Archdeacon Claude had the credit also of having fathomed the mystery of the colossus of Saint Christopher, and of that lofty, enigmatical statue which then stood at the entrance of the vestibule, and which the people, in derision, called "Monsieur Legris."But, what every one might have noticed was the interminable hours which he often employed, seated upon the parapet of the area in front of the church, in contemplating the sculptures of the front; examining now the foolish virgins with their lamps reversed, now the wise virgins with their lamps upright; again, calculating the angle of vision of that raven which belongs to the left front, and which is looking at a mysterious point inside the church, where is concealed the philosopher's stone, if it be not in the cellar of Nicolas Flamel.It was, let us remark in passing, a singular fate for the Church of Notre-Dame at that epoch to be so beloved, in two different degrees, and with so much devotion, by two beings so dissimilar as Claude and Quasimodo.Beloved by one, a sort of instinctive and savage half-man, for its beauty, for its stature, for the harmonies which emanated from its magnificent ensemble; beloved by the other, a learned and passionate imagination, for its myth, for the sense which it contains, for the symbolism scattered beneath the sculptures of its front,--like the first text underneath the second in a palimpsest,--in a word, for the enigma which it is eternally propounding to the understanding.Furthermore, it is certain that the archdeacon had established himself in that one of the two towers which looks upon the Grève, just beside the frame for the bells, a very secret little cell, into which no one, not even the bishop, entered without his leave, it was said.This tiny cell had formerly been made almost at the summit of the tower, among the ravens' nests, by Bishop Hugo de Besan?on* who had wrought sorcery there in his day.What that cell contained, no one knew; but from the strand of the Terrain, at night, there was often seen to appear, disappear, and reappear at brief and regular intervals, at a little dormer window opening upon the back of the tower, a certain red, intermittent, singular light which seemed to follow the panting breaths of a bellows, and to proceed from a flame, rather than from a light.In the darkness, at that height, it produced a singular effect; and the goodwives said: "There's the archdeacon blowing! hell is sparkling up yonder!"*Hugo II. de Bisuncio, 1326-1332.There were no great proofs of sorcery in that, after all, but there was still enough smoke to warrant a surmise of fire, and the archdeacon bore a tolerably formidable reputation.We ought to mention however, that the sciences of Egypt, that necromancy and magic, even the whitest, even the most innocent, had no more envenomed enemy, no more pitiless denunciator before the gentlemen of the officialty of Notre-Dame. Whether this was sincere horror, or the game played by the thief who shouts, "stop thief!" at all events, it did not prevent the archdeacon from being considered by the learned heads of the chapter, as a soul who had ventured into the vestibule of hell, who was lost in the caves of the cabal, groping amid the shadows of the occult sciences.Neither were the people deceived thereby; with any one who possessed any sagacity, Quasimodo passed for the demon; Claude Frollo, for the sorcerer.It was evident that the bellringer was to serve the archdeacon for a given time, at the end of which he would carry away the latter's soul, by way of payment.Thus the archdeacon, in spite of the excessive austerity of his life, was in bad odor among all pious souls; and there was no devout nose so inexperienced that it could not smell him out to be a magician.And if, as he grew older, abysses had formed in his science, they had also formed in his heart.That at least, is what one had grounds for believing on scrutinizing that face upon which the soul was only seen to shine through a sombre cloud. Whence that large, bald brow? that head forever bent? that breast always heaving with sighs?What secret thought caused his mouth to smile with so much bitterness, at the same moment that his scowling brows approached each other like two bulls on the point of fighting?Why was what hair he had left already gray?What was that internal fire which sometimes broke forth in his glance, to such a degree that his eye resembled a hole pierced in the wall of a furnace?These symptoms of a violent moral preoccupation, had acquired an especially high degree of intensity at the epoch when this story takes place.More than once a choir-boy had fled in terror at finding him alone in the church, so strange and dazzling was his look.More than once, in the choir, at the hour of the offices, his neighbor in the stalls had heard him mingle with the plain song, ~ad omnem tonum~, unintelligible parentheses.More than once the laundress of the Terrain charged "with washing the chapter" had observed, not without affright, the marks of nails and clenched fingers on the surplice of monsieur the archdeacon of Josas.However, he redoubled his severity, and had never been more exemplary.By profession as well as by character, he had always held himself aloof from women; he seemed to hate them more than ever.The mere rustling of a silken petticoat caused his hood to fall over his eyes.Upon this score he was so jealous of austerity and reserve, that when the Dame de Beaujeu, the king's daughter, came to visit the cloister of Notre-Dame, in the month of December, 1481, he gravely opposed her entrance, reminding the bishop of the statute of the Black Book, dating from the vigil of Saint-Barthélemy, 1334, which interdicts access to the cloister to "any woman whatever, old or young, mistress or maid." Upon which the bishop had been constrained to recite to him the ordinance of Legate Odo, which excepts certain great dames, ~aliquoe magnates mulieres, quoe sine scandalo vitari non possunt~. And again the archdeacon had protested, objecting that the ordinance of the legate, which dated back to 1207, was anterior by a hundred and twenty-seven years to the Black Book, and consequently was abrogated in fact by it.And he had refused to appear before the princess.It was also noticed that his horror for Bohemian women and gypsies had seemed to redouble for some time past.He had petitioned the bishop for an edict which expressly forbade the Bohemian women to come and dance and beat their tambourines on the place of the parvis; and for about the same length of time, he had been ransacking the mouldy placards of the officialty, in order to collect the cases of sorcerers and witches condemned to fire or the rope, for complicity in crimes with rams, sows, or goats.
或许您还会喜欢:
犯罪团伙
作者:佚名
章节:17 人气:0
摘要:托马斯·贝雷斯福德夫人在长沙发上挪动了一下身子,百无聊赖地朝窗外看去。窗外视野并不深远,被街对面的一小排房子所遮挡。贝雷斯福德夫人长叹一口气,继而又哈欠连天。“我真希望,”她说道,“出点什么事。”她丈夫抬头瞪了她一眼。塔彭丝又叹了一口气,迷茫地闭上了眼睛。“汤米和塔彭丝还是结了婚,”她诵诗般地说道,“婚后还能幸福地生活在一起。六年之后,他们竞能仍然和睦相处。这简直让人不可思议。 [点击阅读]
狐狸那时已是猎人
作者:佚名
章节:14 人气:0
摘要:苹果蠹蛾的道路没关系,没关系,我对我说,没关系。——维涅狄克特埃洛费耶夫苹果蠹蛾的道路一只蚂蚁在抬一只死苍蝇。它不看路,将苍蝇掉了个过儿,然后爬了回去。苍蝇比蚂蚁的个头儿要大三倍。阿迪娜抽回胳膊肘儿,她不想封住苍蝇的路。阿迪娜的膝盖旁有一块沥青在闪亮,它在阳光下沸腾了。她用手沾了一下。手的后面顿时拉出一根沥青丝,在空气中变硬,折断。这只蚂蚁有一个大头针的头,太阳在里面根本没有地方燃烧。它在灼。 [点击阅读]
狗年月
作者:佚名
章节:48 人气:0
摘要:你讲。不,您讲!要不,就由你讲吧。也许该由演员开始?难道该由稻草人,由所有这些稀里糊涂的稻草人开始?要不,就是我们想等着,等到这八颗行星在宝瓶座中聚集在一块儿?请您开始吧!当时,到底还是您的狗叫了。可是在我的狗叫之前,您的狗已经叫了,而且是狗咬狗。 [点击阅读]
狼穴巨款
作者:佚名
章节:47 人气:0
摘要:1945年3月。北海上刮着凛烈的寒风。在纳粹德国一个秘密潜艇基地里,一艘潜艇固定在巨大的墩柱上。流线型的舰首在晨曦中显得轮廓格外明晰。在潜艇的腰部有一块跳板,一长队孩子正踏着跳板登上潜艇。他们彼此手挽手走着、仰起脸看着这艘奇怪的黑色船舶。有个人拿着名单在核对孩子们的名字。在潜艇的瞭望塔里,站着一个纳粹海军军官和一个穿黑大衣的高个子男人。 [点击阅读]
猎奇的后果
作者:佚名
章节:43 人气:0
摘要:他是一个过于无聊而又喜好猎奇的人。据说有个侦探小说家(他就是因为大无聊才开始看世上惟一刺激的东西——侦探小说的)曾担心地指出,总是沉迷在血腥的犯罪案中,最终会无法满足于小说,而走上真正的犯罪道路,比如说犯下杀人罪等等。我们故事里的主人公就确确实实做了那位侦探小说家所担心的事情。由于猎奇心理作祟,最终犯下了可怕的罪行。猎奇之徒啊,你们千万不要走得太远。这个故事就是你们最好的前车之鉴。 [点击阅读]
猫与鼠
作者:佚名
章节:15 人气:0
摘要:君特-格拉斯在完成了第一部叙事性长篇小说《铁皮鼓》之后,我想写一本较为短小的书,即一部中篇小说。我之所以有意识地选择一种受到严格限制的体裁,是为了在接下去的一本书即长篇小说《狗年月》中重新遵循一项详尽的史诗般的计划。我是在第二次世界大战期间长大的,根据自己的认识,我在《猫与鼠》里叙述了学校与军队之间的对立,意识形态和荒谬的英雄崇拜对学生的毒化。 [点击阅读]
王子与贫儿
作者:佚名
章节:5 人气:0
摘要:爱德华:爱德华和汤姆这两个少年,是这篇故事的主角。他们两个人,由于偶然的巧合,不仅是同年同月同日生,而且两个人的面貌也很相似,但两个人的命运却有天壤之别。爱德华是英国的王子,汤姆则是个小乞丐。有一天,爱德华王子在宫苑里散步,看到一个卫兵正在怒责一个衣衫褴褛的少年,由于同情心,他就带这少年进入王宫,想不到却因此发生一连串意想不到的事情,差一点几就丧失了英国王位的继承权。 [点击阅读]
玩偶世家
作者:佚名
章节:5 人气:0
摘要:本剧作者亨利克·易卜生(1928-1906),是挪威人民引以自豪的戏剧大师、欧洲近代戏剧新纪元的开创者,他在戏剧史上享有同莎士比亚和莫里哀一样不朽的声誉。从二十年代起,我国读者就熟知这个伟大的名字;当时在我国的反封建斗争和争取妇女解放的斗争中,他的一些名著曾经起过不少的促进作用。易卜生出生于挪威海滨一个小城斯基恩。 [点击阅读]
环游黑海历险记
作者:佚名
章节:33 人气:0
摘要:范-密泰恩和他的仆人布吕诺在散步、观望和聊天,对正在发生的事情一无所知。君士坦丁堡的托普哈内广场一向因人群的来往和喧哗而热闹啡凡,但在8月16日那一天的晚上6点钟,却静悄悄地毫无生气,几乎是一片荒凉。从通向博斯普鲁斯海峡的港口高处看下去,仍能发现它迷人的景色,但里面却没有什么人。勉强有一些外国人匆匆而过,走上狭窄、肮脏、泥泞、有黄狗挡道的通向佩拉郊区的小街。 [点击阅读]
玻璃球游戏
作者:佚名
章节:23 人气:0
摘要:引言——试释玻璃球游戏及其历史一般而言,对于浅薄者来说,对不存在的事物也许较之于具体事物容易叙述,因为他可以不负责任地付诸语言,然而,对于虔诚而严谨的历史学家来说,情况恰恰相反。但是,向人们叙述某些既无法证实其存在,又无法推测其未来的事物,尽管难如登天,但却更为必要。虔诚而严谨的人们在一定程度上把它们作为业已存在的事物予以探讨,这恰恰使他们向着存在的和有可能新诞生的事物走近了一步。 [点击阅读]